Reviews

BYD Atto 1: A very short drive in a Very Important little electric car

For years, one of the stock arguments against electric cars has been that they are for the wealthy. That they are merely expensive toys for early adopters, far removed from the realities of normal car buyers.

That may once have been true. But over the past 12 to 18 months in Australia, that line has become increasingly difficult to sustain. And not even a month into 2026, the arrival of cars like the BYD Atto 1 looks set to push that argument well into retirement.

Starting at $23,990 before on-roads, the Atto 1 is cheaper than a Toyota Corolla – one of the first cars you think of when thinking about entry level vehicles in Australia. The Atto 1 isn’t a premium SUV or a tech showcase. It’s a basic, small hatchback that sits right in the heart of the market, where people actually shop.

Press cars for the Atto 1 have yet to be made available, but I decided to take one out for a half hour test drive from the local BYD dealership, just to get some first impressions on a car that represents a major shift in the EV pricing debate.

With such limited time behind the wheel, it’s far too early to make any firm judgements. But in that brief drive, the Atto 1 didn’t feel obviously flimsy, unpleasant, or like something designed by an accountant rather than an engineer.

Being a front-wheel drive, it carries a slight nose-heavy feel on the road, but it’s also calm and predictable, which is what you’d expect from a small, affordable hatchback.

Choosing FWD here makes sense: it’s cheaper to build, more space-efficient, and generally helps with efficiency. That said, I still tend to prefer rear-wheel-drive cars for their better balance and sharper response through corners.

At first glance I couldn’t help but think that it looks like a toy Lamborghini Urus, but I was relieved to find that it doesn’t feel like a toy once inside. The interior doesn’t look like it was assembled from leftover plastic bins either. It’s modern, clean and recognisably BYD, borrowing a lot from the Dolphin and Atto 3, just scaled down and simplified.

That’s all well and good, but it’s also what you’d expect from a car launched in 2026, even a cheap one. The bar is no longer whether it has electric windows, but instead whether it feels like something you could comfortably drive every day.

On the road in suburban traffic, the Atto 1 behaves like most small EVs. It’s quiet and easy to drive, pulling away cleanly from the lights. None of that is remarkable in 2026, it’s simply what electric cars do well.

The base model Atto 1 offers a remarkable price, but it does also lack some basic features that I think should come standard in any modern car.

Things like wireless phone charging, rain-sensing wipers, power-folding side mirrors, lights on the vanity mirrors, front parking sensors, power-adjustable seats. Blind spot indicators are also missing, and somewhat confusingly they are also omitted from the premium model.

With a quoted range of just 220 kilometres, the base model would be hard to recommend for anything beyond city duties. The premium’s larger 43kWh battery offers a more reassuring 330kms of claimed range. 1 seconds will get you from 0-100km/h in the base, and about 9 seconds for the premium. But let’s be honest, you’re not buying this car for its sporting credentials.

Whether the Atto 1 turns out to be a great car or a merely adequate one will require much longer testing. For now, all the Atto 1 has really proven is that a very cheap electric car can feel normal. In a market where people have been told for years that EVs are only for the wealthy, that might be its most disruptive feature of all.

  • There's nothing wrong with an affordable car being forgettable. You get exactly what you wanted and paid for...be happy.

  • ”Things like wireless phone charging, rain-sensing wipers, power-folding side mirrors, lights on the vanity mirrors, front parking sensors, power-adjustable seats. Blind spot indicators are also missing”

    Does the base Toyota Corolla have those things? If so, you might have a point.

    But really, for a budget car, about the only thing from that list which I might expect (and would miss not having) would be front parking sensors.

  • Hopefully that low purchase price is combined with low servicing costs. If it is and this is combined with home charging, particularly for someone with their own solar, the TCO would be considerably better than a similar ICE car!

  • "The premium’s larger 43kWh battery offers a more reassuring 330kms of claimed range. 9 seconds will get you from 0-100km/h in the base, and about 11 seconds for the premium. But let’s be honest, you’re not buying this car for its sporting credentials."

    You have the performance numbers backwards.

    Also, not so long ago, a 0-100 under 10 seconds was considered pretty sporty. We don't all need sub-4s cars!

  • Cheaper than a Corolla? It’s cheaper than a Yaris. Reviewers hop out of a $60k car and look down their noses at something less than half the price. What we want to know is how it compares with the key products at that price point, electric and other.

    I like basic, I didn’t have air conditioning in a car until 2015. Wireless charging, so what, blind spot monitoring is the only one I would like to see, after all it’s supposed to be a five star car. There have been instances where Aussie cars are being decontented however.

  • This car is long overdue. I do not want any of the add-ons anyway; EV's in their bare form are much easier to drive than my 2015 Suzuki Celerio, which is fine to drive anyway. My only criticism of the Atto 1 is that its heavy for a 'small' car at 1.4 tons; maybe the promised new version of the balde battery will save weight in the next model.

  • An interesting first take, Sam. A good follow-up would be a direct comparison with a Corolla and possibly a couple of other similar ICE cars on driving and general practicality for ordinary people business like shopping, carting kids around etc. You haven't discussed superior internal space for people and goods which seems to be taken for granted by EV drivers but largely unknown by others. That comparison should also include some larger model ICE cars for further comparison. Also, a deeper look into running and maintenance costs, again in comparison to similar ICE cars and including charging practicality on various AC and DC options, ideally considering sizes of home solar useful for varying proportions of charging over a working week would be an important part of the cost equation. Perhaps stating the obvious, if one of these can be be adequately topped up using an existing power outlet at home, versus installing a smart charger, the upfront cost is lower with energy cost saving compared to ICE beginning immediately.

GAC Aion UT electric hatchback confirmed for Australia

GAC Aion UT electric hatchback confirmed for sale in Australia, months after automotive giant's launch…

16 hours

Want a safe car? Crash tests say you should go electric

Electric cars are proving to be the safest vehicles in Australia, with battery-powered models making…

19 hours

Kia reveals updated EV6 with larger battery and minimal price increase

Kia has revealed a minimal price increase of just $70 across its updated EV6 lineup,…

20 hours

California fights back against Trump with $US200 million EV tax credit

California has proposed a $US200 million zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) incentive program designed to partially offset…

1 day

Review: Living with the MSI EZgo portable EV charger

Is a portable charger worth upgrading to? We tested the MSI EZgo to see how…

1 day

Surprise for owners as Musk announces that Tesla will stop selling FSD

Tesla to stop selling FSD in a big shift from original strategy with subscription the…

2 days