Source: BMW
Yes, the headline is a bit of a tease and quite unthinkable, of course. Or maybe…?
Here’s the problem:
BMW’s strategy is in a dark place of the past, based on some board-level shenanigans.
The evidence:
Is the power of franchised dealers a drag on BMW’s strategy/survival? In fact, is that a fundamental difference in philosophies between the old guard and the new world; i.e dealers selling to prospects v buyers buying online?
The good things about BMW are their brand’s reputation for speed, style & build-quality. Incomparable, they would say. Can’t be replicated easily. Unassailable, they would say.
Really? How sure are they? Can they survive on these attributes alone?
If I was selling a horse that was fast, reliable, well-mannered & very pretty (if you like that sort of thing), would you buy one to ride to work? Lots of peeps ride horses but they keep them for leisure (or racing).
So, let’s imagine that full EVs are:
Then who on earth would buy a petrol/diesel/PHEV BMW for daily use? You might buy one for the weekend if you had that sort of money. But goodbye dealers and goodbye mass market. Hello, empty assembly lines and layoffs. Hello, looming bankruptcy. Hello, new Board. Hello takeover. Hello Amazon. (or VW or GM/Tesla).
BMW’s factories with their high-quality assembly lines, engineers and stylists would be a great acquisition if you had access to batteries. Unlike BMW with it’s paltry USD$1.7b.
Amazon has just taken a significant investment in EV-LCV/SUV-maker, Rivian which claims good forward battery contracts. VW has invested in a USD$40b battery pipeline for the next few years, aiming for enough battery supply to stop ICE production altogether.
Tesla make their own batteries at whatever rate they like and they’re building another battery factory in Shanghai to serve the Chinese market which will soon pivot completely to EVs (because their one-party government wants to, and can). GM is snuggling up to Tesla. (They’ve been seen on romantic dates).
The current keys to battery acquisitions are access to economically competitive sources of Lithium, Cobalt, Nickel and Manganese. [Cross off Cobalt for Tesla; they’re getting rid of the need for it].
These minerals can become barriers to entry for late entrants to the battery market, after all the cheaper sources have been locked up. Of course, solid state batteries with new anode/cathodes could invalidate current platforms – maybe BMW is banking on that, but why then announce maximum 15% electrification?
And what exactly does BMW intend to sell in Norway, Netherlands, France and other countries which have already legislated a timetable to forbid sales of non-electrified vehicles by 2025/30. (Add China, and others soon).
So, how long is it before BMW finds itself making beautiful, well-engineered cars that no-one wants?
Would you like any books with your BMW?
Bede Doherty is an independent consultant in climate change mitigation, specialising in transport including fuels/powertrains, fuelling infrastructure and emissions.
A three year delay to proposed updates to the National Construction Code will make it…
Zeekr's 7X shows massive charging speed improvements, peaking at a stunning 632 kW and helping…
Suzuki's first electric offering in Australia approved for sale, paving the way for a potential…
Tesla hits over 74,000 supercharger stalls with 3,500 added in Q3 2025, alone, helping with…
Japanese brand Mazda confirms that it will bring a new EV to the Australian market…
RedEarth Energy Storage says pre-orders for its vehicle-to-grid electric vehicle charger will start in November,…